It seems to me, since let just evaluates to a call to Select that this should work if you implement a LINQ-style Select method, similar to the SelectMany method you implemented already, only simpler. I may be missing something, though.
It seems to me, since let just evaluates to a call to Select, that this should work if you implement a LINQ-style Select method, similar to the SelectMany method you implemented already, only simpler. I may be missing something, though.
Thank you for your answer. I have tried that, but the problem is the transformation func in Select() only takes one argument, thus I cannot sent in the aggregator. Now the aggregator is there, its just wrapped in an anonymous type that is not the same type as the one we want to return.
And I can't see how to get past this type mismatch. – asgerhallas Feb 11 at 0:38 @asgerhallas: I don't entirely understand what you're hoping to make it do. Can you provide details on how you would expect let to behave in this case?
– StriplingWarrior Feb 11 at 3:17 Sorry for the unclear question. I have provided details and resulting behavior of the usage of let now :) – asgerhallas Feb 11 at 8:58.
It seems to me, since let just evaluates to a call to Select, that this should work if you implement a LINQ-style Select method, similar to the SelectMany method you implemented already, only simpler. I may be missing something, though. Terms of service.
I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.