1 parents shouldn't be informed. If the behavior stops. 2 both sets of parents should be informed, and stronger consequences should be enforced.
3 parents should have been notified long before it reached the month, and something else should have been done. 4 nothing should be done 5 I think not only should Joey's and Tim's parents should be notified but all of the children's parents should be. 6,7, and 8 parents should be told from the first incident.
Parents cannot help the situation any if they do not know what's going on. In our school system there is a 0 tolerance policy when it comes to being a bully. My daughter was bitten by another classmate and the boy was suspended from school for the remainder of the week.
It doesn't look like the elementary school my son will attend has any specific notification policies about bullying or mean behavior. I believe that schools should inform parents when (1) the school can not fully resolve the behavior issues on their own and (2) the behavior will easily spill over into the child's time at home. You're not really asking this, but the fault in nearly all of your examples lies not with the children but with the teachers.
Telling a kid to "cut it out" doesn't resolve behavior problems. If the teacher can act as a mentor and mediator between the kids and guide them as they resolve whatever is _causing_ the bullying, that's when behavior changes.
I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.