Ambassador Stevens BEGGED FOR MORE security and was denied by Obama?

Strange that liberals claimed that when Bush policies led to the deaths of terrorists, it only served to create more terrorists, yet when Obama policies lead to the deaths of terrorists, liberals believe that it causes them to love Americans. Obama policy would not allow for protection of Stevens and his staff.....any more that you could tell a weird neighbor how much you trusted him, but send an armed guard with your child whenever he walked past that neighbor's house. Obama has long advocated an atmosphere of mutual trust with the Islamic extremists.

This policy would necessitate an absence of security for American Diplomats in order for Obama to imply that trust. Any contingency of military protection assigned to Stevens and his staff would have served to raise questions concerning this policy of mutual trust. I believe that, somewhere, among the fine print of Obama Foreign Policy, lies the instructions for limited security which led to the death of Ambassador Stevens.

Obama killed Ambassador Stephens and the Navy Seals with his naive policies. And, when we dig a bit deeper, we find even more reason for Obama to lie about the details. The Obama Administration actually went against the advice of Secretary of Defense Robert M.

Gates, national security adviser, Thomas E. Donilon, and the counter terrorism chief, John O. Brennan.

(Quote from NY Times article at the time of the Libyan invasion.) "In joining Ms. Rice and Ms. Power, Mrs. Clinton made an unusual break with Secretary of Defense Robert M.

Gates, who, along with the national security adviser, Thomas E. Donilon, and the counter terrorism chief, John O. Brennan, had urged caution.

Libya was not vital to American national security interests, the men argued, and Mr. Brennan worried that the Libyan rebels remained largely unknown to American officials, and could have ties to Al Qaeda." We must also note that the UN Resolution authorizing the invasion was penned by Susan Rice and Hillary Clinton. Rice and Clinton actually coerced the votes necessary for it's passage.

It is all documented here, March 18, 2011): Everyone who is looking for the truth and for the reasons why Obama MUST lie to us about the death of Stevens should read the entire article. http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/19/world/...

Some Republicans would use an Ambassadors death as an excuse to steal an election.. And Fox News would be the exclusive ringleader.

I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.

Related Questions