Motherboard and cpu issue. Motherboard socket is 95W max and fx-8320 is 125W, as long as you are aware of this, voiding any warranties involved. Power supply mismatch - power supply has no pcie 6 pin connectors because it is an ancient design for Pentium 4 systems.
The 12V rail is 25A peak power rating, which is 300W peak. Gaming is continuous use. Should not exceed 80% = 240 watts 12V.
Cpu 125W, gpu 130w, hdd 35 watts estimate, cooling fans 17W estimate Total=307 watts. And, probably a top mount in the system used as an exhaust pushing temperature up, expect catastrophic failure during gaming. Agree that it does not matter with the motherboard whether you use SATA II or SATA III HDD, because it runs SATA II regardless.
Yes, a pcie x 16 2.0 accepts and runs PCIe x 16 3.0 at 2.0 transfer rates like all AMD motherboards, since they have no pcie x 16 3.0 motherboards with AMD CPU sockets and chipsets. If this is primarily gaming, since gaming only uses up to 4 cores of a cpu, $120 FX-4300 will closely match or exceed gaming performance (higher clock) of the FX-8320 $174. You can use some of the difference to get a respectable adequate power supply.
You also meet the MB spec with the FX-4300. http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/gami... http://pcpartpicker.com/parts/cpu/#sort=... Adding: Biostar is generally the 2nd lowest quality of components used, just ahead of ECS, but, it does support the CPU and raises to SATA III available.
Need more ram, get 6 or 8 gigs, get an aftermarket cpu cooler, the pcie 2.0 will work just not up to full speed, you won't notice a difference in speed between 2,0 and 3.0 pcie.
I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.