Are intelligent voters a threat to the status quo?

I define intelligent as "acting successfully in a complex, competitive, hostile, and imperfect society. " Asked by MorePrudence&Wisdom 41 months ago Similar questions: intelligent voters threat status quo Politics & Law > Politics.

Similar questions: intelligent voters threat status quo.

This is a true conundrum. A conundrum is a: a question or problem having only a conjectural answer, b: an intricate and difficult problem. .

First, the status quo may or may not be a desirable state of affairs. So, whether you see something as a "threat" to the status quo depends on whether you see the status quo as benign or problematic. .

An "intelligent voter" is, presumably, someone who knows his own interest and whether or not the status quo is benign or problematic with respect to it. If the status quo is generally oppressive, then the intelligent voter will be a threat to it; if he is among the oppressed, then he will not. If the intelligent voter is among the oppressors, then he will not be a threat to the status quo (although other intelligent voters will).

The converse would be true if the status quo were generally benign. . In this case, "intelligent" is defined as "acting successfully in a complex, competitive, hostile and imperfect society," so we may assume that the status quo is "a complex, competitive, hostile and imperfect society."

But this depends on 1) whether voters have any actual effect on their society, 2) whether intelligent voters vote in sufficient numbers to effect that change, and 3) whether intelligent voters truly vote for their own narrow self-interest, for their enlightened self-interest, or for the society at large regardless of their own interest. . From here on, the complexity of the question increases geometrically, depending on whether you consider a "competitive" society better or worse than a "cooperative" society, or a "hostile" society better or worse than a "friendly" society, etc.And all the permutations thereof.

. The question as asked will yield a different answer depending on how you fill in its missing information with assumptions.. Zuma's Recommendations Masters of Deception: Escher, Dali & the Artists of Optical Illusion Amazon List Price: $17.95 Used from: $9.71 Average Customer Rating: 4.5 out of 5 (based on 27 reviews) The Ultimate Book of Optical Illusions Amazon List Price: $14.95 Used from: $5.14 Average Customer Rating: 4.5 out of 5 (based on 3 reviews) Impossible? : Surprising Solutions to Counterintuitive Conundrums Amazon List Price: $27.95 Used from: $16.50 .

Too many variables to determine an answer the question. Following the same line of thinking as in the concurrent question, When will the world end? The status quo ends now, because the world is always in a state of change.As a baby through the first 33 year, life is about surpassing your previous accomplishments.

About age 33 you begin to lose some of your abilities, can't run as fast or lift as much weight, etc.. It may start earlier in life or you can exert a major effort to delay it a few years. Considering your definition, Stalin was a success because he died a natural death; but tler was a failure because he lost his conquests & the German nation and committed suicide.An intelligent person invented pennicillin. A dummy cause the warning "Do not attempt to cut someone's hair with hedge trimmers" to be included with the directions.

Someone did win a lawsuit because they weren't told that factoid. Both are changes in the status quo. Were the Enron execs successful?

They ended up rich, some are in jail, some were never tried.Is a political person a failure because he lost the race for the Presidency and another person a success because he finally got the job he wanted - driving a gargage truck or enforcer for the mob, or run the largest & most profitable drug cartel in the world. I used some extreme examples, but nothing that could not be possible. The intent of the question is excellent, however, more specific details are needed..

3 INTELLIGENT VOTER--------I think I met one once...

INTELLIGENT VOTER--------I think I met one once...

I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.