What I've done is to wrap (in my case Linq2Sql) in my own custom class, which implements the repository pattern, here's the pasted excerpt from a previous but somewhat related answer I'd recommend reading through The Onion Architecture and looking at the MVC StoreFront videos for inspiration. The magic part is, pushing the Linq2Sql part or EF stuff to one side, So you don't sit on top of it as much as, Pull it in if you want it, that way you could use Linq2Sql or EF or N This is more work, but gives you more flexibility Here's my example CarProject In Car. Core project public interface ICarRepository { IQueryable GetAllCars(); void Add(Car); } I then have a implementation of the interface which wraps up access to the generated Linq2Sql class Car.
Data project public class SqlCarRepository : ICarRepository { private CarDataContext _context; public SqlCarRepository() { _context = new CarDataContext(); } #region ICarRepository Members public IQueryable GetAllCars() { return _context. Cars; } You could have a EF equivilent ofcourse, or Nbernate I haven't got all this completely sorted, and I'm still learning but I currently have these projects: Car. Core --- All the interfaces and domain objects, DTO's etc Car.Core.
Tests --- The tests of the core business logic. Car. Web --- Asp.Net MVC frontend Car.Web.
Tests --- Tests for the website Car. Data --- The Linq2Sql stuff lives in here Car.Data. Tests --- The tests for the DAL layer In your scenario you could either put EF in Car.
Data or maybe change it to Car. Linq2Sql and Car.EntityFramework. Not sure what I'd do.
What I've done is to wrap (in my case Linq2Sql) in my own custom class, which implements the repository pattern, here's the pasted excerpt from a previous but somewhat related answer. I'd recommend reading through The Onion Architecture and looking at the MVC StoreFront videos for inspiration. The magic part is, pushing the Linq2Sql part or EF stuff to one side, So you don't sit on top of it as much as, Pull it in if you want it, that way you could use Linq2Sql or EF or NThis is more work, but gives you more flexibility.
Here's my example CarProject In Car. Core project public interface ICarRepository { IQueryable GetAllCars(); void Add(Car); } I then have a implementation of the interface which wraps up access to the generated Linq2Sql class.Car. Data project public class SqlCarRepository : ICarRepository { private CarDataContext _context; public SqlCarRepository() { _context = new CarDataContext(); } #region ICarRepository Members public IQueryable GetAllCars() { return _context.
Cars; } You could have a EF equivilent ofcourse, or N I haven't got all this completely sorted, and I'm still learning but I currently have these projects: Car. Core --- All the interfaces and domain objects, DTO's etc Car.Core. Tests --- The tests of the core business logic.Car.
Web --- Asp. Net MVC frontend Car.Web. Tests --- Tests for the website Car.
Data --- The Linq2Sql stuff lives in here Car.Data. Tests --- The tests for the DAL layer In your scenario you could either put EF in Car. Data or maybe change it to Car.
Linq2Sql and Car.EntityFramework. Not sure what I'd do.
In my Entity Framework project, I've kept all the auto generated code as it is, and extended some of the auto generated partial classes for more specific functionality (I sometimes convert the object of the auto generated classes to my project classes). I think the model and some of your extensions to it should be in one assembly. You can have different classes that will hold the data in a different way - and they should be in a different assembly that the DataModel assembly will reference.
Perhaps I don't see the question right. If you want, try and further explain what you're trying to achieve.
If I want to separate my C# assemblies into 3-layers (DataAccess, POCO and UI, or however you like it), Entity Framework's auto generated models do not come with much help. Coz, models and data-access codes reside in the same place. What is your answer then?
If you know N you can understand that, Nbernate strongly supports repository pattern and through which it is very easy to separate an application into 3 layers. If case of EF's auto-generated code, I can find no clear cut way to use Repository pattern. Or you can suggest me any other DA pattern for EF, if you like.
– Saqib May 9 '10 at 8:43 You can treat Entity Framework's auto generated as the DataAccess, write a different assembly that will contain the POCO part and a different assembly for UI. You don't have to treat the auto generated classes as your POCO. Remember that they usually won't fit exactly like what you need for your program since they are too automatic.
– brickner May 9 '10 at 12:13.
Well you can create separate models over your database schema by eliminating the tables in each you don’t require. You can do this with either L2S or the Entity Framework. I'm guessing that’s not what you mean however.
You would not be able to include entities from both models in a query. Most people what to do this for maintenance reasons; i.e. Split the model into modular chunks.
I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.