Because it's the basis of womens value, shouldn't beauty be taken into consideration, with regards to abortion?

If you mean "biological evolution", then the answer is "No. That sort of evolution occurs to whole populations and occurs only from one generation to the next. That is: individuals do not evolve biologically.

Only multi-generational populations do." If you mean some **other** sort of "evolution", please specify! 2) Do you consider death a stage in evolution or the end of evolution?

Neither. Again: biological evolution operates on multi-generational populations. The extinction of an entire population would be the end of evolution for that population.

Death of a particular individual or even a particular generation would not be the end of evolution for that population as long as some members of that population survive to procreate. 3) A person is born into the world and then begins his or her evolution of growing, learning and creating. Typically those are not considered "evolution".

4) This person creates a idea or movement that sends many other people into further evolution. You seem to be describing the evolution of ideas, or perhaps the evolution of society or culture. In any case, that is not describing the evolution of individual persons.

Yes, and there's no excuse that they're not. It's pathetic that WWE is run by people with such tight buttholes that they only listen to the fans at their convenience. WWE needs change.

It's tired and old.

I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.