Call of Duty Black Ops vs Battlefield Bad Company 2?

BF: Bad Company 2 is wayyy better than Black Ops. Here are some reasons. 1) Huge maps & huge warfare 2) No camping 3) No overpowered killstreaks that dominate the game (this encourages camping) 4) Full fledged vehical warfare: tanks, boats, at4, helicopters, (several different types of each) 5) Full destructible buildings, people can't camp because you can just bring the entire building down.

6) Graphics are really good, the environment is the best I've ever seen but the gun detail isn't as good. 7) Requires much more teamwork than Black ops. One person can't win the match, you have to work as a team if you want to win.

8) No noobtubes! Those are my reasons why Bad Company 2 beats black ops & and other call of duty game. BUT, Battlefield 3 is coming out soon (September?) and it will be 100x better than bad company 2.

It literally has the best graphics I have ever seen in my entire life. The giant FPS battle of this year consists of BF3 vs MW3. I'm rooting for BF3, even though I used to be a CoD fanboy.

Bad company 2. It's alot more fun. Great multiplayer and the campain is WAAAAY better than cod.

Bad company 2 was amazing but battlefield 3 is gonna be better! Battlefield is the better produced game of two.

I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.