Your citation of the preclusion of any judgment for a landlord who has not registered with the clerk of the court under NJSA 46:8-26 is correct, and furthermore, 46:8-29 requires the landlord to provide all new tenants with a copy of said registration. The answer to your question seems simple. As the judge has made an offer to the attorneys in the case that they do not have to accept, one or preferably both of them should file a motion stipulating agreement with the offer provided the court's order notes that the landlord is in non-compliance with the law, and therefore the plaintiff is entitled to KEEP the returned money as abatement.
Your friend should make sure it is spelled out, or it is a trick. Otherwise he should hold his ground and if need be appeal the court's decision for obvious procedural error and file a complaint with the judicial review board.
What you describe isn't really that unusual.
I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.