Can Pamela Anderson be accused of child abuse since she doesn't keep her 'twins' in enough clothes?

I think the CPC would agree that her twins have been severely abused. Aren't there protection rights when it comes to the hundreds of photos being taken of them and sold to the media? Don't they get a percentage, or a savings account for when they 'mature'?

What about time spent doing shows or movies? I don't think they made a cent during all those seasons of Bay Watch. In fact... I think they were subject to multiple traumatic surgeries.

I bet they have no self-esteem since mommy didn't like them 'just the way they are'. I'm sure they're both in therapy now. Thanks Pamela!

This made me laugh! I wouldn't be able to find someone who would complain about her twins being barely covered! I think a women who is beautiful like her should let her girls go free if she wants to...

Too funny....Pamela can dress however she wants to.....

Nice one wdawe. This could go so many directions...

No, I do not believe it would be concidered child abuse as long as all their private parts were covered. I think she is a very pretty woman, but I do not like that suit on her. Please!

flickr.com/photos/pamanderson/3139939017.

I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.