The definition of T in that grammer does indeed appear to be unnecessary complication. T can generate any string of a s and be s, so the simpler definition would have been just as good.
I found this definition of a non-palindrome quite intuitive. I assume that the author started with a definition for a palindrome.
I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.