She was involved in such demonstrations, but how major a leadership role she played is under dispute. Eyewitness accounts place her at planning meetings but also characterize her as contributing a "moderate voice" to those proceedings. For the record, the demonstrations did not "shut down" the university.
Similar protests went on at schools across the country. Does Clinton's participation in the demonstrations and trial 30 years ago reflect negatively on Clinton in the present? Only if you assume that student activism is bad and that having once been involved in it taints one for life.
Taking into account the turmoil of the times and the widespread spirit of dissent on college campuses everywhere during the Nixon/Vietnam era, Clinton's documented activities were relatively tame and rational. One can certainly disagree with her politic beliefs, but the evidence shows Clinton was neither anti-American nor a gun-toting revolutionary, however much certain parties in the present would ... more.
I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.