It's hardly a debate when a constitutional law professor who graduated with honors takes on a venture capitalist whose career was made, not by creating and selling an actual product, which would teach him about manufacturing, but by picking up failing companies, stripping their pension funds and then putting those companies back on the market again.
Cuz In a debate sure to sway millions of voters and quite possibly change the course of mankind if not the very orbit of the heavenly bodies in the Milky Way, President Obama last night crushed Mitt Romney like a bug, displaying an agile and fecund intellect rivaled only by Albert Einstein and possibly Socrates. Already the smartest man ever to hold the office of president, the one-time constitutional law professor lectured his pathetic opponent on the profound ramifications of Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier, held court on the pros and cons of the Austrian School versus Hydraulic Macroeconomics, and delivered a 14-minute recitation of Federalist Paper No.
51 from memory, justifying big government as “the greatest of all reflections on human nature.” Jim Lehrer, the clearly unbiased moderator employed by the government-funded Public Broadcasting Service, opened the debate with clearly unbiased questions for the two contenders. “What,” he asked Mr. Obama, “is your favorite color?”
The president delivered a 22-minute dissertation on the estimated 16,800,000 colors in the world before concluding, “They’re all pretty cool.” “What,” Mr. Lehrer then said to the GOP challenger, “is the air-speed velocity of an unladen swallow?” Mr. Romney’s time ran out as he asked, “African or European?” Mr. Lehrer, another searing genius, deeply probed the candidates on America’s most-pressing problems.
“To both of you, I think the nation demands to know: Should airliners have windows that roll down?” “I oppose that,” Mr. Obama said, “unless they’re installed at $1,200 an hour by union workers in either Ohio or Florida.” “You, of course, know,” Mr. Romney said, “that I was only joking when I ” Unfortunately, a flashing red light prompted Mr. Lehrer to cut him off. The format was tightly structured: The first three segments were (seriously) “the Economy I, the Economy II, the Economy III.” The brilliant dean of moderators again blazed with brilliance: To Mr. Obama he asked, “So, the economy, how’s all that going?” “Well, Jim, I’m glad you asked.
See, there’s a lot of misinformation out there. Look, has it been as easy as I thought to fix? No.
Have we done everything we thought we’d do in four years? Absolutely not. But have we fixed the problems, making America’s economy stronger than it has ever been before?
You bet we have. So far, we have created 500 million new jobs. We have made sure that all Americans who want jobs not only finds one, but usually need to find at least two to make enough money to pay their taxes.
We have cut the unemployment rate from above 10 percent to negative 3 percent. That means we’re literally waiting for children to be born, and when they are, boom, they immediately have jobs. So, are Americans better off now than they were four years ago?
Nuh uh. They’re much worse off. But is everything in America absolutely fantastic?
You better believe it, Jim.” Mr. Romney, apparently struck dumb by the answer, stood silent for a full minute, then managed only “I, I, I, don’t know where to begin,” before his buzzer sounded.
I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.