I like Herman Cain also. I always have. I think Romney or Perry has the best chance.
However, as it stands right now, any of the Republican candidates can beat Obama. If nothing changes for the better as it relates to the economy, any of these candidates will not only beat Obama, but will beat him like a drum. Personally, I think Ron Paul is delusional, and in fact, might prove to be as bad as Obama if elected.
But I would even vote for him over Obama. Your question works either way, but again I have to agree. Mitt Romney is not the most conservative of the Republican candidates.
This is also the biggest problem Romney will have winning the Republican nomination. It has been said that it took 4 years of Jimmy Carter to give us 8 years of Ronald Reagan. After Obama, this country is going to look for a real conservative.
Quite frankly, I wonder if Romney is far enough "right" to satisfy the anger over Obama. NOBAMA in 2012!
Actually, I think we will do better if we don't settle for just one until the convention. The sooner we decide, the more time the DNC mud-slinging machine will have, along with their sycophants in the media, to tear that candidate apart. Better to let the convention be something everyone in America will be on the edge of their seat to watch....as if IT were the election itself, if you know what I mean.
I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.