What would have happened is what actually happened when Bush actually targeted the NAACP: a number of people were angry, the press never covered the story and it all blew over rather quickly with no hearings, no accountability or any consequences for anybody involved. EDIT: Douche, there are more examples than one but we don't have to name any more than one to make a point furthermore, do you think the quantity has an effect on the quality of the example? Whether or not Obama "went after" anybody at all is in dispute.
There is no comparison to the single example we cite under Bush until or unless something establishes comparable actions by Obama, and your uninformed wishful assumptions do not count as "establishing" facts. Atop everything else, the IRS "went after" nobody in this case. The applicants requested the scrutiny of the IRS by filing their applications.
The methods for scrutiny might violate some technicality of protocol but at the end of it all, the only harm done is some degree of inconvenience and hissy fit for the applicants scrutinized. The teabagger applicants are furthermore every bit as homogeneous a single example as the NAACP and they are furthermore furthermore a fringe minority that hardly accounts as "everyone" In addition to the three or four other glaring and comical errors you make, you ask a hypothetical you don't know actually happened which makes you look like one big fat dumb jackoff and you know it. Do yourself a favor and just delete the question before you make any bigger a horsesass of yourself.
An e-mail I sent to a prominent African-American journalist/commentator with whom I occasionally correspond: "Sir, "Now imagine she was white." That's the line from a female on an all-white jury in John Grisham's novel "A Time to Kill." The jury returned an acquittal of the black defendant who had avenged his daughter's death at the hands of racists.
I have read little if any commentary from African-American journalists about the IRS targeting groups with the words "Tea Party" or "Patriot" in their names. Now imagine the terms were "Civil Rights" and "black." Your thoughts?"
Strangely, I have not yet received a reply.
I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.