Do the HIPAA Privacy Rule’s requirements for authorization and the Common Rule’s requirements for informed consent differ?
Yes. Under the Privacy Rule, a patient’s authorization is for the use and disclosure of protected health information for research purposes. In contrast, an individual’s informed consent, as required by the Common Rule and the Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) human subjects regulations, is a consent to participate in the research study as a whole, not simply a consent for the research use or disclosure of protected health information.
More.
I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.
Related Questions
Are we allowed to combine the HIPAA Research Authorization and Informed Consent that have to be reviewed and signed to enroll participants in a study?
What is a "waiver" of informed consent? How is it different from a waiver of documentation of informed consent?
What is the difference between HIPAA “Authorization†and informed consent?
Will the Privacy Rule affect informed consent documents for clinical research involving intervention or interaction with subjects (clinical trials, survey studies)?
Is a faxed copy of the signed consent or parental permission form acceptable to document informed consent?
Does the HIPAA Privacy Rule require hospitals and doctors' offices to be retrofitted, to provide private rooms, and soundproof walls to avoid any possibility that a conversation is overheard?