Only if they EACH embrace God's will for them, as told in his holy Scriptures (and, then they would no longer be of different faiths, as you describe them.) So... no... Babylon the Great actively supported the 1986 International Year of Peace, designated as such by the United Nations organization, the charter of which calls on it “to maintain international peace and security.” During that year, the Catholic pope, the Anglican Archbishop of Canterbury, and 700 other religious leaders, (including professed Christians, Buddhists, Hindus, Muslims, African animists, native Americans (Indians), Jews, Sikhs, Zoroastrians, Shintoists, and Jains), met together at Assisi, near Rome, to pray in behalf of peace. More recently, in January 1989, the Sydney, Australia, Sunday Telegraph wrote that members of “the Buddhist faith, Christian, Hindu, Jewish, Muslim, Sikh, Unitarian, Baha’i, Confucian, Jain, Shinto, Tao, Raja Yoga and Zoroastrian” had met in Melbourne for the fifth assembly of the World Conference on Religion and Peace.
Significantly, "More than 600 delegates from some 85 countries . . .
Acknowledged that tensions are caused by religious differences which have been pointed to as contributors to war." Religious involvement in the search for peace confirms what Dag Hammarskjöld former secretary-general of the “The UN Organization and the churches stand side by side as participants in the efforts of all men of good will, irrespective of their creed or form of worship, to establish peace on earth. Notwithstanding, Babylon the Great’s protest marches, her public demonstrations, and her other more subtle forms of religious meddling in political affairs will lead to her undoing.
Already it has caused considerable friction, as Albert Nolan, a Dominican friar from South Africa, recently admitted, saying: “The only effective way to achieve peace in accordance with God’s will is to get into the fight. . .
. To achieve armament reduction, conflicts with the government are almost unavoidable. Let Babylon the Great continue to cry for peace.
Let the pope continue to offer his traditional Urbi et orbi (to the city Rome and the world) blessing at Christmas and Easter. Let him continue to suppose—as he did last May—that the present easing of political tensions is God’s answer to “Christian” prayers. **Mouthing words of peace and arrogating to herself God’s blessing cannot absolve Babylon the Great from her bloody past.
It brands her as being the greatest hindrance to peace between humans, as well as between humans and God, that has ever existed. Directly or indirectly, mankind’s every problem can be traced to her door! Ironicly, false religion continues to strive --in conjunction with the UN-- to bring about the very “peace and security” that will precipitate her destruction!
False religion’s end will vindicate the God of true religion, who says: “Do not be misled: God is not one to be mocked. For whatever a man is sowing, this he will also reap.”—Galatians 6:7. Source: "Religion’s Future in View of Its Past" Part 23—1945 onward "The Time for Settling Accounts Is Near" (about 1989's World Conference on Religion and Peace) "AWAKE!" magazine: 1989 Dec 8, pages 25 & 27 "Identifying Babylon the Great.
To have "mutual respect", means that the groups would have to find the other groups' practices and customs has having equal value to their practices and customs. I can't see that ever happening. Since there is continuous conflict even between sects of "Christians, Muslims, Jews, and even Atheists", how will those who are outside of those groups ever be valued?
I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.