Does a POTW/control authority need to monitor specifically for pesticide active ingredients to ensure that a facility is complying with the PFPR rule?

No, monitoring may not be economically feasible and there may not be analytical methods available for all pesticide active ingredients. Compliance with the P2 alternative may be shown through ensuring that P2 practices have been implemented, the appropriate treatment is in place and is well operated and maintained, and documentation has been prepared and is readily available at the facility. If a facility chooses to comply with zero discharge through "no flow" of process wastewater, the POTW/control authority would mostly ensure compliance through facility inspection of the PFPR process areas.

However, if a facility is complying with zero discharge by demonstrating non-detect levels of pesticide active ingredients and priority pollutants, analytical methods must exist and the POTW/control authority would monitor at a minimum for expected priority pollutants and those pesticide active ingredients used in PFPR production. More.

I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.