Be requires a to be of a nullable type or reference type. If a is non-null, the result of a? Be is a otherwise, the result is be The operation evaluates be only if a is null.
Be requires a to be of a nullable type or reference type. If a is non-null, the result of a? Be is a; otherwise, the result is b.
The operation evaluates be only if a is null.
Yes, it short circuits. Class Program { public static void Main() { string s = null; string s2 = " WriteLine(s2?S.ToString()); } } The above program outputs "" rather than throwing a NullReferenceException.
Yes. Public Form1() { string string1 = "test"? Test(); MessageBox.
Show(string1); } private string test() { MessageBox. Show("does not short circuit"); return "test"; } If it did not short circuit, test() would be called and a messagebox would show that it "does not short circuit".
Furthermore it would be inconsistent to make this operator short-circuit for bool, when it is non-short-circuit for int. By the way, I think I have never used | for logical comparisons intentionally, finding it is very inconvenient to speak of | as a logical operator. || however is for logical comparisons, where short-circuit evaluation works fine.
The same is valid even for C and C++, where the origin of those operators is.
I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.