Does WCF's WS-Security implementation fully support the specification?

WCF doesn't encrypt Body element itself. It encrypts body content but as mention in related question it doesn't offer fine granularity to selectively encrypt deeply nested elements in the body element.

WCF doesn't encrypt Body element itself. It encrypts body content but as mention in related question it doesn't offer fine granularity to selectively encrypt deeply nested elements in the body element. The question is if MAY encrypt child elements of either the S:Header and S:Body elements means direct child or any nested element.

Anyway WCF doesn't violate the standard but it doesn't have to implement every single detail of the standard - as many other WS-* protocol stacks don't as well.

I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.