Don't you love how cons gleefully use the Benghazi issue, but most liberals never used 9/11? as a way?

No, I don't. It was an unfortunate situation, but I don't think the claims of Republicans have any merit. Benghazi was a terrorist attack, and the Obama administration admitted as much once they confirmed that was indeed what it was.

There was initial confusion as to what exactly happened, but there was no deliberate cover up. I believe Republicans are trying to exploit American deaths for political gain by trying to claim there was some kind of cover up of what happened in Benghazi. My beliefs are confirmed by the fact that Republicans care more about trying to blame someone in the administration than trying to catch the attackers or improve diplomat security.

I do. I just question whether all the fault can be laid on the president alone, whether it isn't hypocritical of the right to put as much emphasis on Benghazi as they do while forgetting about similar incidents under Reagan and G.W. Bush, and even if it was all Obama's fault, I question the efficacy of trying to impeach Obama. You guys can knock yourselves out trying, of course, I won't stop you.

But suppose it works - are you prepared for president Biden?

Cons think that Fox news has given them the whole story and that the dems don't know what's going on... but as usual... Fox has left out a lot of key details (mainly all the things that actually absolve Obama from all criminal wrongdoing), so they're playing with only half the deck... that's usually the problem most of the time...

I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.