Has anyone used praxisiimath com as a source of problems for the Praxis II math exam? His sample problems look hard?

S sample problems look hard, and yet everyone says the sample problems from ETS turn out to be way too easy compared with the actual exam. Asked by JayRosen 23 months ago Similar questions: praxisiimath source problems Praxis II math exam sample hard Science > Math.

Similar questions: praxisiimath source problems Praxis II math exam sample hard.

The Praxis II math exam Actuary talking: "There are three kinds of actuaries. Those that can count. And those that can't." (Attributed to Fred Kilbourne)2.

An actuary is someone who wanted to be an accountant, but didn't have the personality for it.3. An accountant is someone who wanted to be an actuary, but didn't have the personality for it.4.An actuary is a place where they bury dead actors. (Submitted by John Dinius at 75112.3530@compuserve.

Com)5. Two people are flying in a hot air balloon and realize they are lost. They see a man on the ground, so they navigate the balloon to where they can speak to him.

They yell to him, "Can you help us - we're lost." The man on the ground replies, "You're in a hot air balloon, about two hundred feet off the ground. " One of the people in the balloon replies to the man on the ground, "You must be an actuary.

You gave us information that is accurate, but completely useless." (Attributed to Fred Kilbourne at Fred@thekilbournecompany. Com in the Journal of Commerce on 4/21/78, and submitted by David Fountain at fountain@supernet. Net) The actuary on the ground yells to the people in the balloon, "you must be in marketing."

They yell back, "yes, how did you know? " The actuary says," well, you're in the same situation you were in before you talked to me, but now it's my fault. " (This joke was improved upon by both John Dinius and Stacey Haws at [email protected])6.

Definition of a computer: An actuary with a heart.7. Actuarial bumper stickers: a) Actuaries probably do it. B) Actuaries do it with frequency and severity.

C) Actuaries do it without risk. (c submitted by Jeffery E. McGill at jeff_mcgill@mercer.

Ca) d) Actuaries do it by integrating by parts. (d submitted by [email protected]) e) Actuaries do it continuously and discretely. (e submitted by Larry Decker at FranDecker@aol.

Com) f) Actuaries do it until death or disability, whichever comes first. F sub 1) Actuaries due it until death, disability or withdrawal. G) Actuaries do it with varying rates of interest.

(f and g submitted by Walt Lowrie at [email protected]) (f sub 1 submitted by Larry Tarini at trazzogoiby@yahoo. Com) h) Actuaries do it with models. (h submitted by Paul Budde at [email protected]) i) Actuaries do it with reserve.

J) Actuaries do it with assurance. K) Actuaries do it with APL.(i, j and k submitted by Cameron Brett at [email protected]) l) Actuaries do it with professional guidance. (l submitted by Gerard Farmar at [email protected].

Com) m) Take a risk - marry an actuary.(m seen by Philip Lew.) n) Actuaries make it come out right.(n submitted by Jerry Enoch at jefren@verizon. Net)8. Three men are sentenced to die by guillotine.

The first man steps up, places his head in the hole, the executioner release the knife, and miraculously the knife stops inches above the man's neck. The king says, "Under the laws of our country, if the guillotine fails to do its job, you are declared free. " So the first man gets up, relieved, and the second man takes his place.

Again, the guillotine knife stops inches away from the man's neck. The king says again, "Under the laws of our country, if the guillotine fails to do its job, you are declared free. " So the second man gets up, free.

The third man, who is an actuary, puts his head in the guillotine hole, looks up, and says, "I think I see what the problem is ... "9. An actuary is someone who brings a fake bomb on a plane, because that decreases the chances that there will be another bomb on the plane.10. What is the difference between an introverted actuary and an extroverted actuary?

An introverted actuary stares at his own feet during a conversation, while an extroverted one stares at the other person's feet. (Attributed to Al Beer; Submitted by Sue Scott at sue. [email protected])11.

Two actuaries are duck hunting. They see a duck in the air and they both shoot. The first actuary's shot is 20 feet wide to the left.

The second actuary's shot is 20 feet wide to the right. The actuaries give each other high fives, because on average they shot it.(Several variations on this: golf shots; head in refrigerator and feet in oven; etc.)12. An actuary is a person, who passes as an expert on the basis of a prolific ability to produce an infinite variety of incomprehensive figures calculated with micrometric precision from the vaguest of assumptions based on debatable evidence from inconclusive data derived by persons of questionable reliability for the sole purpose of confusing an already hopelessly befuddled group of persons who never read the statistics anyway!(Submitted by Kathleen Miller at Kathleen.C.

[email protected]) Sources: http://jokes.praxisiimath.com/ .

Has anyone used praxisiimath com as a source of problems for the Praxis II math exam... With 'The Conscious Mind: In Search of a Fundamental Theory' David Chalmers introduced a radical new element into the debate about consciousness when it was perhaps in danger of subsiding into unproductive trench warfare. Many found some force in his arguments; others have questioned whether they are particularly new or effective, but even if you don't agree with him, the energising effect of his intervention can still be welcomed. Chalmers believes (and of course he's not alone in this respect) that there are two problems of consciousness.

One is to do with how sensory inputs get processed and turned into appropriate action; the other is the problem of qualia - why is all that processing accompanied by sensations, and what are these vivid sensations, anyway? He calls the first the 'easy' problem and the second, which is the real focus of his attention, the 'hard' problem. Chalmers is careful to explain that he doesn't mean the 'easy' problem is trivial, just nothing like as mind-boggling as qualia, the redness of red, the ineffably subjective aspect of experience.

The real point, in any case, is his view of the 'hard' problem, and here the unusual thing about Chalmers' theory is the extent to which he wants to take on two views which are normally seen as opposed. He wants behaviour to be explainable in terms of a materialist, functionalist theory, operating within the normal laws of physics: in fact, he ends up seeing no particular barrier to the successful creation of consciousness in a computer. But he also wants qualia which remain mysterious in some respects and which appear to be have no causal effects.

He doesn't quite commit himself on this last point: the causal question remains open (qualia might over-determine events, for example, having a causal influence which is always in the shadow of similar influences from straightforward physical causes) and he does not sign up explicitly to epiphenomenalism (the view that our thoughts actually have no influence on our actions) - but he thinks the current arguments for the opposite views are faulty. All the words in the mental vocabulary, on his view, acquire two senses: there is psychological pain, for example, which plays a full normal part in the chain of cause and effect, and affects our behaviour: and then there is phenomenal pain, which does not determine our actions, but which actually, you know, hurts . Sources: consciousentities.com/chalmers.htm .

(CT requires 029). TX! " "how can you become better at math" "Need help with solving math problems" "Are computers good at solving math problems?

" "anybody good with math" "I am looking for a study guide for the Praxis II Math Content Knowledge (061) exam. Does anyone know of a good one?

I am looking for a study guide for the Praxis II Math Content Knowledge (061) exam. Does anyone know of a good one?

I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.