Heres when Obama called Benghazi an "act of terror" which Romney denied he said...?

It was promoted as a spontaneous terror attack committed by anyone on the eve of 911 fueled by a video on day 1 and referred to as such for a month by Obama staffers/Amb. To U.N. Rice through all news outlet, talk shows, and WH briefings to diminish the resurgence of Islamist (AL QUEDA) whose operative carried out the attack on the eve of 9/11 in memory of UBL. Focusing on the video threw more fuel to the fire than the video since it's release months prior to throw attention away from mid east policy that may be viewed as weak against mid east terrorist groups by outspoken journalist whose seen first hand the danger the U.S. faces from these groups.

Copy & paste to address bar: CNN after the debate http://video.search.yahoo.com/video/play... http://www.policymic.com/articles/16154/... http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/10/10... http://www.humanevents.com/2012/10/10/bombshell-security-officer-testifies-that-state-dept-ignored-his-request-for-more-protection-in-benghazi It began spontaneously in response to video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uFf0dUH3OtU Libyan president on CNN http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4RMUld48hz4.

In this excerpt you list, he is talking about acts of terror in general. If he had meant Libya, he would have said "these acts of terror will never shake the resolve." But he didn't, he said no acts of terror.

Romney did not lie, he interpreted the meaning of the speech.

I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.