High density Silverlight charting control?

Check out Visiblox ( visiblox.com ) Charts. I'm working on a telemetry application at the minute which uses three of their charts in the same Silverlight component, plotting about 36,000 points in total, and there is very little slowdown in terms of performance, if any at all.

Check out Visiblox ( visiblox.com/ ) Charts. I'm working on a telemetry application at the minute which uses three of their charts in the same Silverlight component, plotting about 36,000 points in total, and there is very little slowdown in terms of performance, if any at all. They have a high performance example on their website here - visiblox.com/examples/LargeDataSets.

I chose to use Visiblox after loooking at the following blog post: scottlogic.co.uk/blog/colin/2010/12/visi... My telemetry example is now part of a CodeProject article that I have created, if you want to take a look!

Visifire is the fastest chart now. Check out the blog link below. visifire.com/blog/2011/12/02/fast-silver... The Chart image says Visifire is 3 to 4x faster than Visiblox..!

Infragistics claims to be able to handle massive amounts of data in their recently released xamDataChart. infragistics.com/dotnet/netadvantage/sil....

Based on the recommendations here, I have just trialled Visiblox and Infragistics. Visiblox has a good developer experience, clean APIs, no bloat. While the performance is OK for a few thousand datapoints, performance breaks down as you go into the 100k range.

Here's the Visiblox sample with a few thousand points (you can download the sample and just tweak the number of datapoints). Now, the common argument here is that you should not bind that much data to a chart anyway, but should do some trimming beforehand. I do agree with that, but ideally, I want a chart control that does take care of that for me.

Getting Zooming, Panning and all that right are non-trivial tasks and I'd be happy to shell out a few 100$ to get that functionality. It's plain economic common sense to not reinvent the wheel here. Infragistics certainly gets that right.

I can bind a million odatapoints and get smooth peformance. Here's the Infragistics sample. However, Infragistics installs a lot of junk (a local IIS web app with the samples you can also see online) and besides the (excellent) samples and the code-level documentation, I do miss some high-level introduction to each component and it's individual modules.

Since a lot of people on SO recommend Telerik controls for their clean APIs, Documentation and Developer Support, I did also take a look at their chart control. However, I must admit I find it rather slow (Zooming takes roughly 500-1000ms, which is too long to feel smooth). Here's the Telerik sample.

Before you start playing around with WritableBitmap on your own take a look at WriteableBitmapEx from René Schulte, he blogs about it here. Awesome stuff.

Excellent suggestion! I've since had a fiddle with WritableBitmapEx to write a small game, but haven't gotten started on anything charts wise quite yet. Quite a nice library.

Thanks Anthony. – ahosie Apr 29 '10 at 0:38.

I don't know of any OSS or 3rd party controls that'll do what you need. The one case where I've had the need for 100K+ of datapoints, we made it work by keeping it simple. The biggest perf killer was the number of elements within each datapoint.By keeping the element a simple ellipse with a static brush fill the app was rather snappy.

Here is a link to one of their demos where they are using 100.000 data points: demos.telerik.com/silverlight/#Chart/Sam... I should also mention that I have not used the charting controls myself, so I cannot vouch for them. But the demos look good to me.

The link loads a blank page. – Big Boss 15 hours ago.

I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.