Descriptive analysis of data collected involved reading the corpus of material in order to describe the different perspectives and/or ways of thinking in relation to the above stated questions. The research team carefully read all responses collated to elicit patterns of meaning, contradictions and inconsistencies. Contrasting ways of thinking and exceptions to patterned routines, that included contradictory descriptions, were examined.
Thematic analysis of data contributed to an initial picture of career pathways which formed the basis of a discussion paper to inform the first round of stakeholder consultations. More.
I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.