First, treatments of multiple sclerosis (MS) don’t stand the test of time. If they were effective, they wouldn't fall by the wayside from year to year. Second, they don't hold up to scientific scrutiny.
Basically there is only one proper way to evaluate a proposed treatment - a double-blind control study. A double-blind control is a study in which two groups of patients are started in a program at the same time. One group gets the treatment and the other gets a placebo - an inactive pharmaceutical substance given to compare the effect of the "real" treatment on trial.
Neither the patient nor the doctor knows who got the real treatment and who got the placebo until the end of the study.
I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.