How do naturopathic physicians and conventional medical doctors differ?

One of the most significant differences between a naturopathic physician and a conventional medical doctor becomes apparent when you take a look how each views and addresses an infection. Many doctors do not even consider the role of the immune system in the susceptibility to or treatment of an infection. They do not fully understand that the immune system, if functioning optimally, can adequately defend against virtually all infectious organisms except those that are particularly virulent.

Whether we develop an infection or not is a result of the strength of our defense mechanisms versus the virulence of the infective organism. An infection can be thought of, loosely, as like a mathematical equation, such as one plus two equals three. In an infection, what will determine the outcome is the interaction of the host's immune system with the infecting organism.

A naturopathic doctor tends to use treatments designed to enhance the immune system, whereas most conventional doctors tend to use antibiotics designed to kill the infecting organism, even if antibiotic therapy has been shown to be of limited (if any) value.

I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.