She is right where she should be. She was provided with a choice - she went with her beliefs which broke the law (if I believe murder is justified, should I get off when I kill you?). She had plenty of warnings and yet still refused to follow a legal court order.
So, she did what she needed to do and the court did what they needed to do. The only ones who screwed up was the committee for not firing her earlier.
I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.