If you are going from blonde to black, you really better see a professional experienced in hair coloring. Trying to do it yourself could be a real disaster! .
I don't think you should. Bleach removes color from hair and I personally think that any color over the bleached hair would show up much brighter than wanted. I say to just go to a pro to fix it.
If you dye it right now, the black would absorb into the hair follicles in a way that may make the black look waaaay too black. Give your hair some time to recover and be prepared to start using deep conditioning treatments to get it back to healthy again. Good luck!(from experience) 3 months ago.
Tnxx so much! Leannehardeman 3 months ago .
In the front section, rick rack hair in 5 sections at the top of the head, spray, flat iron including last bits off of braid starting where you secured the braid with a clear rubber band. Remove large you pins, brush hair out and tease. Then you are going take the back section where the braids are and remove pins brush out and tease as well.
Now, take the back section with the braids and you are going to fold this in your hands into the shape of a ball and pin. This will serve as “filler” for the front section to give the hair the height needed and that anchor to give the hair lasting power. Now that you have done this, you will take the teased front section and fold that over the “ball” shape that you created with the back section.
This look looks almost like a french twist/beehive from the front.
I've been contemplating a similar problem, and although I don't have a solution in use anywhere yet, your question did make me think it out some more. I think you should be able to use a group to accomplish this You can add something like this to your Gemfile: group :workers do gem "extra_gem_1" gem "extra_gem_2" end Then, you can call Bundler. Require(:default, :workers) and that should load your gems.
How this works will depend on your setup, you might be able to add logic to config/application. Rb or you might need to do this elsewhere. This might be hackish, but it works in the console anyway When installing your gems, you can call: bundle install --without workers to exclude those gems from production Alternatively, you can use two Gemfiles, but that seems like a mess as well since presumably there's some crossover.
I've been contemplating a similar problem, and although I don't have a solution in use anywhere yet, your question did make me think it out some more. I think you should be able to use a group to accomplish this. You can add something like this to your Gemfile: group :workers do gem "extra_gem_1" gem "extra_gem_2" end Then, you can call Bundler.
Require(:default, :workers) and that should load your gems. How this works will depend on your setup, you might be able to add logic to config/application. Rb, or you might need to do this elsewhere.
This might be hackish, but it works in the console anyway. When installing your gems, you can call: bundle install --without workers to exclude those gems from production. Alternatively, you can use two Gemfiles, but that seems like a mess as well since presumably there's some crossover.
Our Rails application pulls feeds from multiple sources. The workers that pull these feeds need gem dependencies for rmagick, oracle databases, and many other gems. In short, they have very different dependency needs than the main web application.
Until Rails 3 and Bundler, life was good. These worker gem dependencies are irrelevant to our actual production website. Under Rails 3, one Gemfile is expected to contain all these dependencies.
This has the nasty side effect of requiring all gem dependencies to be loaded within the production app, which would cause pointless bloat, possible security issues, memory leaks, complicate deployment, and other ills. Sadly, Bundler breaks the standard require mechanism, which would have provided a way out of the quagmire by allowing us to simply require the necessary gems only in the worker and have them somewhere on the system, not in the bundle. The workers use our rails models to file their data.
Can anyone suggest solutions to make the system practical in Rails 3? I am tempted to make the Gemfile use conditional environment variables in places to drive the gem commands, however, it seems the Gemfile. Lock could make this problematic going from working on one worker script (for the feeds) to the next, which would have different dependencies.
I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.