Here's my opinion...when I look up at the sky at night I cant possibly believe that" Sorry to say but your opinions, your inability to believe or accept various things or your lack of understanding of science are all completely irrelevant. It wasn't an accident but a complex interaction of effects. Your lack of understanding is not evidence for the existence of gods.
Edit: "Personally I would rather die belieiving in something" This is not evidence for the god you happen to believe in. It's a meaningless emotional statement. I believe lots of things but the existence of gods isn't one of them.
This sentence was rather poorly worded, so I'm not sure if you mean you'd rather die believing in something as opposed to staying alive believing in nothing (which would be absurd.. you'd rather be delusional and die rather than be rational and live?) or if you meant that when you die you want to die believing in something (Pascal's Wager which is fallacious.) "No scientist can tell me why we sre here floating in the middle of nowhere not knowing what else is out there?" Depends what you mean by why. If you are asking about some cosmic significance to existence, then science doesn't even try to answer that question because that's not a scientific question.
That's more a question for philosophy. Anyone can have an understanding of philosophy, even a scientist. Now if by why you mean cause and effect, then sure, certain scientists in related fields could tell you why.
Whether you'd be able to comprehend their answers is your problem, not theirs. I'm also curious what you mean by saying "not knowing what else is out there..." and, frankly, scientists have a lot more knowledge on that subject than you do. See, when you understand what we really do know as a species, you begin to learn to ask better questions about what we don't know.
I'm all for asserting ones ignorance, but you seem to be promoting a wilful ignorance where we shouldn't try to learn anything new (either individually or as a species) because there are things we don't understand. I'm baffled at how you seem to expect science and scientists to be infallible and omniscient. No one makes those kinds of claims.
When you understand science and you understand what a theory is, you understand how what you're saying makes no sense. "The fact that we can go to space but are unable to reach other galaxies etc. because of how far they are does not seem to be an accident to me im sorry" I don't think you know what accident means since the word doesn't apply in this context. There are real, understandable reasons for why the stars are so far apart.
Go read a book on astrophysics. If stars were much closer together (so that we could reach them easily) they would obliterate each other. And no, that isn't reason to believe goddidit for us, that's looking at things through the wrong end of the microscope.
We're only here because this planet suits life, this planet doesn't suit life because we are here. Again, the way things seem to you are completely irrelevant. Why is your benchmark whether we have the technology of travelling to these places?
Sounds extremely xenocentric to me. The universe wasn't made for us. The universe doesn't care how far we can travel within it.
It is extremely arrogant to think otherwise. "All im saying is a big bang sounds like bullshit" Then go to college, get an advanced degree in astrophysics and come up with an alternative like the many others who have done exactly that. You're not special enough to be able to sit at home on your computer typing on the Internet that the big bang is bs and expect anyone to take you seriously.
The big bang is a cosmological model for the origins of the universe given certain assumptions, one being that the curvature of spacetime is flat. If spacetime is flat, that necessitates a singularity. If not, no singularity is required.
There is a great debate going on now about the curvature of spacetime. If you don't understand what I'm talking about, then you have no business making judgments about the big bang.
I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.