Bill Clinton was never accused of drugging or raping anyone. He had consensual sex (oral) with an adult woman and possibly several women. Maybe he abused his authority but he raped no one.
BIll Cosby has been accused of drugging and raping multiple women over a long period of time. He has been convicted of nothing (yet). See the difference?
Clinton was hounded, exposed, and ridiculed at the height of prower in the white house! Cosby had the nerve to prattle, preach sanctimoniously as if he was some kind of a paragon of virtue! Whilst both are equally unsavoury in the pursuit of feeding their uncontrollable appetite, Cosby had the cheek, to attempt to stop the deposition being unsealed, which illustrated him as NO saint.
Cosby is in every living room thanks to his TV work, influencing gullible viewers. He has global reach. The more Cosby seeks to escape and answer for his actions on trial, by using whatever means necessary, the less innocent he appears!
Cosby "sells" an image at odds with his true nature. It can be read as, well he got away with it, then it must be alright to ply drugs, or whatever, to get what one wants. Consent?
The right to chose? Or the Cosby way? Clinton is neutered, history.
Cosby is still in play unfortunately due to his acting work.
I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.