Is it better to use malloc or calloc to allocate memory?
In general using malloc is faster, since calloc initializes the allocated memory to contain all zeroes. If this is what you want, however, then calloc can be used. The results can vary among different operating systems and environments, though Memory allocation in an OS that uses floating blocks in heaps, such as Microsoft Windows and MacOS, should use the OS-native memory allocators instead Answer Use malloc() almost always and calloc() almost never The reason is that the initialization to zero that calloc() performs is usually not very helpful: The initialization to "all-bits-zero" is not necessarily the same as initialization to "all-data-zero."
C says very little about the representation of values in memory, nothing at all for floating-point or pointer values. On many machines all-bits-zero representations will in fact correspond to f.p. Zeroes or null pointers, but this is not guaranteed by the language and there have been machines where the correspondence did not hold.
If you get in the habit of using calloc() to initialize f.p. And pointer items, you may be heading for trouble Usually, one allocates a chunk of dynamic memory in order to store something in it -- and when you store something in it, you'll overwrite whatever was there before. Thus, the initialization performed by calloc() is usually not needed anyhow.
There are occasional exceptions where all- bits-zero initialization is helpful, but they are unusual.
Both the malloc() and the calloc() functions are used to allocate dynamic memory. Each operates slightly different from the other. Malloc() takes a size and returns a pointer to a chunk of memory at least that big:void *malloc( size_t size );calloc() takes a number of elements, and the size of each, and returns a pointer to a chunk of memory at least big enough to hold them all:void *calloc( size_t numElements, size_t sizeOfElement );There?
S one major difference and one minor difference between the two functions. The major difference is that malloc() doesn? T initialize the allocated memory.
The first time malloc() gives you a particular chunk of memory, the memory might be full of zeros. If memory has been allocated, freed, and reallocated, it probably has whatever junk was left in it. That means, unfortunately, that a program might run in simple cases (when memory is never reallocated) but break when used harder (and when memory is reused).
Calloc() fills the allocated memory with all zero bits. That means that anything there you? Re going to use as a char or an int of any length, signed or unsigned, is guaranteed to be zero.
Re going to use as a pointer is set to all zero bits. S usually a null pointer, but it? S not guaranteed.
Re going to use as a float or double is set to all zero bits; that? S a floating-point zero on some types of machines, but not on all. The minor difference between the two is that calloc() returns an array of objects; malloc() returns one object.
Some people use calloc() to make clear that they want an array. Malloc is better then calloc. Internally,calloc calls malloc and then fills with zeros.
Hence, two calls is required,one for allocating memory and another call to fill zero's. Hence,calloc is less efficient than malloc. Garbage value is the value which is not useful to user.
Even zero may be garbage value for users. Hence,filling zero's by calloc is of no use. Also,memory allocated by any function is used only after initialising with user choice value.
Hence,accessing memory before initialising is programmers mistake and not mistake of malloc. Hence malloc is more efficient than calloc. Malloc() is allocate 1 byte of memory.
But calloc() is allocate large type of memory allocation. Calloc return's the array of objects. But malloc() return's the one object oly.
Malloc takes only the size of the memory block to be allocated as input parameter. 2. Malloc allocates memory as a single contiguous block.3. If a single contiguous block cannot be allocated then malloc would fail.1.
Calloc takes two parameters: the number of memory blocks and the size of each block of memory2. Calloc allocates memory which may/may not be contiguous.3. All the memory blocks are initialized to 0.4.
It follows from point 2 that calloc will not fail if memory can beallocated in non-contiguous blocks when a single contiguous blockcannot be allocated. One more thing malloc() allocates continous bolck of memory, if not present it returns an error. Both malloc() and calloc() are used to dynamically allocate memory on heap.
2. Malloc() is used to allocate a single block of memory.3. Calloc() is used to allocate multiple blocks of memory.4. It is better to use them when we are working on lists(linked lists, doubley linked lists etc..).5.
At the same time the user must be aware that in c, memory allocated on heap should manually deallocated by the user.6. So, once the memory allocated on heap is of no use, we must deallocate the memory by using the free() function. This is must!
Calloc()is alllocate mlutiple space of memory but mallo0c is allocate a single space of memory. Following are my 2 cents on this problem. Both malloc and calloc return a pointer to the allocated regionI don't think calloc can allot a non contiguous block of memory.
Hi there:malloc is for "memory allocation". While programming, we very often need to allocate free memory for variables of unknown length, which can not be decided at the time of programming. A program prompts people's names; since each person's name is different, the programmer is unlikely to allocate a fixed amount of memory to hold their names.
(You may argue that it is possible to assign a whole bunch of memory; it is a bad practise and it is problem prone. )A similar function is calloc(). A very good book to learn C language is C programming, A modern approach by Amar K.
Does that answer your question?
I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.
Related Questions
How do I over-allocate memory using new to allocate variables within a struct?
Cant allocate memory using MALLOC?
Write a function allocate dynamically memory like malloc?
Understanding the purpose of malloc and calloc?
I'm very confused about malloc() and calloc() on C?
Implementing malloc with gcc in an arm7 problems : malloc return NULL?