Is it possible to call the default-constructor instead of the zero-argument constructor?

You only have a default constructor, if the class has no constructors defined The no-arg constructor should only take the dependencies you give it (i.e. None) and it appears you believe you can still use the class without additional dependencies In Sun/Oracle JVM you can use Unsafe. AllocateInstance(Class) which creates an instance without calling a constructor, but I would try to fix your class design first.

You only have a default constructor, if the class has no constructors defined. The no-arg constructor should only take the dependencies you give it (i.e. None) and it appears you believe you can still use the class without additional dependencies.In Sun/Oracle JVM you can use Unsafe.

AllocateInstance(Class) which creates an instance without calling a constructor, but I would try to fix your class design first.

A default constructor is only created, when you don't provide a constructor yourself. So, as soon as your class has at least one constructor, that default constructor isn't being created.

You only have a default constructor, if the class has no constructors defined. The no-arg constructor should only take the dependencies you give it (i.e. None) and it appears you believe you can still use the class without additional dependencies.

In Sun/Oracle JVM you can use Unsafe. AllocateInstance(Class) which creates an instance without calling a constructor, but I would try to fix your class design first.

I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.

Related Questions