Dave Riley said December 4, 2009 at 7:26 pm A very thoughtful and useful commentary. Another example of the “eurocentricity” of Marxism is the failure of so many left groups in the US and (mainly) Britain to comprehend the significance of the pan Latin American fight back against neoLiberalism and the new rise in revolution there. A standard denigration of Cuba for these sources is that the revolution isn’t real because no “soviets” exist there.
However, I think there is an earlier reference point that parallels the work of key LA figures like Marti, and that’s the approach pursued by Ho Chi Minh and his collaborators whose strategic initiatives were very clearly anti-imperialist and dedicated to creating an indigenous Marxism in practice (but with little theoretical work to reference). While many Marxists seek to turn their back on these experiences the work of people like Hugo Blanco is now being embraced by tendencies in the Green movement as offering a clear synthesis relevant to ... more.
I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.