Is "matter condensing space" better than "matter bending space" to describe gravity?

Warnings - This may not be the answer you want, because I didn't really understand what you are trying to say, but please read on as it may help. 1) It is actually mass that bend the fabric of space-time. Gravity is not a force, it does not ''pull' object, so ''gravitational pull'' is a wrong concept.

Matter does not weight on the fabric of space-time, because weight is mass x gravity, and the distortion of the frabric of space-time determines gravity. The reason why matters are going towards that distortion is because matters tend to go on the shortest path to its destination. The 2D image exaplains nothing, it is so wrong.

2D fabric suggested that space is bend around a massive objext which is not correct. So 2D's fabric does not even support 3D fabric, as 3D fabric suggested that space is bent towards the massive object. 2) There are experiments to support general theory of relativity.

Gravity actually ''bent'' light. But how would light be bent if light always travels in a straight line? Since light has no mass, it is not subject to Newton's law of gravity, and hence, in Newtonian physics gravity has no effect on light.

If space is curved, however, it follows that a ray of light seemingly moving in a straight line really travels in a curved line following the curvature of space. This is comparable, in some way, to the itinerary of a plane. Because the earth is a sphere, the shortest path between two points on earth is described by a geodesic, a curved line.

While moving along the geodesic it would appear to the passengers of the plane that they are moving in a straight line, although they are not. Similarly, the light of distant stars travels through the curved geometry of space before it reaches Earth. This proposition is supported by observation.

When the light of a star passes close to the Sun, it is deflected by the Sun's gravitational field, which causes it to appear slightly displaced. The star appears to be farther from the Sun than it should be. The displacement has been measured by photographing the apparent position of stars during a solar eclipse and comparing these positions with those observed in the night some time later.

Apparent shifts of less than 2 seconds per arc have been measured this way, in close agreement with the predictions of General Relativity. Mostly important part of the General Relativity is that : GRAVITY IS NOT FORCE, IT IS NOT A PULLING FORCE.

The reason supposedly that gravity exists is because of the movement of matter to the lower regions in the fabric of space. " You are DWELLING ON an OVERSIMPLIFIED representation of the idea. That is just a representation...it isn't a 100% picture of reality.

It is only a representation.

I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.