Is possible to use generics in LINQ-to-SQL mapping?
I tried with many different approach. I can say that with LINQ-TO-SQL is not possible to have generic mapping I will try with the Linq-To-Entity.
I tried with many different approach. I can say that with LINQ-TO-SQL is not possible to have generic mapping. I will try with the Linq-To-Entity.
Your suspicion for #2 is incorrect; LINQ-to-SQL (like most ORM's) does, in fact, know which table has the actual association. Parent-child relationships can have navigation properties on both sides of the association. These are taken care of automatically.
I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.
Related Questions
Java Class Generics and Method Generics conflicts?
C# Generics Exception, using Generics on Interface failing at Autofac.ContainerBuilder.Build()?
LINQ 2 SQL :Adding one more table to left join in LINQ 2 SQL statement?
Migrating from “SQL Server” to “SQL Azure, while already using ”Linq to SQL?
LINQ to SQL mapping associations to create a list of entities?
Any flexibility with mapping UDFs in Linq-to-SQL?