Is swimming better than running?
By finally allowing yourself to satisfy your cravings without sabotaging your diet, you can keep the weight you lose off for good, saving yourself hundreds and even thousands of dollars in the process Get it now!
Both swimming and running do have their pros and cons. Which one is better will be decided by your condition. Are you looking to lose fat and slim down?
In that case, running comes out tops, as it burns more fat. Body fat analysis of runners and swimmers shows that runners have far lower body fat than the swimmers. Also runners have stronger bones, since running is an impact activity.
Strong bones offer protection against osteoporosis. But if you have joint problems like arthritis, swimming is a better option. As it is non-impact activity, it doesn’t hurt your joints.To use swimming for weight loss, swim in the water, whose temperature is higher, as research shows that those who swim in cold water, end up feeling hungrier.
So they eat more, thus compensating for the calories lost. For higher weight loss, opt for running if you can. But if you can’t, swimming}} will also do.
Running is not recommended if you have joint problems. This form of exercise will further aggravate your problems with your joint and it will only worsen your condition. Swimming is a better alternative form of exercise if you have this kind of problem.
But you have to be sure that you are not straining your joints too much during swimming. Both are great forms of exercise but it is important to consider your overall health status before you commit yourself in any form of exercise. If you are a person with a normal body built, running for one hour will help you burn up to 472 calories.In swimming, your body will burn up to 354 calories in one hour.
Therefore, running will help you burn more fat but swimming is a safer alternative for your condition. For a complete list of calories burned during exercise, you may refer to this site. nutristrategy.com/activitylist3.htm.
Every exercise has both its fan-boys and detractors - swimming and running being no exception. Most of the disagreements over running and swimming revolve around how the benefits of these exercises are measured. Some choose to measure in terms of calorie burn while others measure by the amount of time it takes to reach a specific goal.
When different athletes use different means of measurement, it's inevitable that they will disagree on the benefits of a given exercise. Whether or not swimming is better than running, or vice versa, really depends on how you measure results. Is it true that swimming requires more physical effort than running?
One of the things cited by proponents of swimming is that it takes more physical effort than running to cover the same amount of distance. In other words, the average person will work harder to swim two miles than he would to run the same distance. As the theory goes, the more physical effort exerted, the more productive an exercise is.
I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.
Related Questions
Will running help improve my swimming? Will swimming help improve my running?
Are there any health benefits for swimming in a swimming pool instead of the sea?
How come the Air Force has better everything? better living, better bases, better "girls", shorter deployments?
Which is better, running cable to DVD player and TV or just running it to TV with s-video + audio cables to DVD player?
Would it better to say, “I am getting better and better at math” rather than “I am excellent at math”?
Why is 6 nights/week better than alternate night NHHD and alternate night NHHD better than 3 nights/week NHHD?