Is there a reason for multiple charities for the same disease? Shouldn't we have one big AIDs Foundation, one big cancer one, etc?

In some cases, I think it makes sense to have two or more charities for the same cause. The visions of the founders of charitable organizations may be completely different. For example, one group may be funding AIDs research, while another group may be working on getting affordable medicine to Africa. The diversity contributes to the overall URL1 may also be safer to have charitable funds divided up rather than consolidated under one board's control.

Especially if there is dishonesty or fraud by the officers or directors, the damage can be limited to the one organization. United Way illustrates an umbrella organization that supports a number of community charities. The amount going to each charity varies.

Some may like the idea of goving to the community in general. Others may prefer to give directly to the organizations they support and avoid having some of their contribution used for orgaizations they do not support.

Nothing is ever so simple, alas. Different charities fund different aspects of the fight against specific issues, or support of victims..

I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.