The following suggestions might be completely off target. I use NginX myself for development purposes; however, I’m absolutely not an expert on NginX. NginX Workers Nevertheless, your problem brought back to memory something about workers and worker processes in NginX.
Among other things, the workers and worker processes in NginX, are used to decrease latency when workers blockend on disk I/O and to limit number of connections per process when select()/poll() is used. You can find more info here. NginX Fcgiwrap and socket Another pointer might be the following code, although this example is specific for Debian.
#! /usr/bin/perl use strict; use warnings FATAL => qw( all ); use IO::Socket::UNIX; my $bin_path = '/usr/local/bin/fcgiwrap'; my $socket_path = $ARGV0 || '/tmp/cgi. Sock'; my $num_children = $ARGV1 || 1; close STDIN; unlink $socket_path; my $socket = IO::Socket::UNIX->new( Local => $socket_path, Listen => 100, ); die "Cannot create socket at $socket_path: $!
\n" unless $socket; for (1 .. $num_children) { my $pid = fork; die "Cannot fork: $! " unless defined $pid; next if $pid; exec $bin_path; die "Failed to exec $bin_path: $! \n"; } You can find more information about this solution here.
Set the socket timeout as low as it can go and then close the socket. If you try to write anything to the socket after that what happens? It is possible to push unescaped binary to signal a close connection through, forcing it to end.
That's how IE became known as Internet Exploder.
I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.