Obama 2008: is obama 08 an "freak accident of history" Jimmy carter 1976 obama 2008? 2010 Now?

Unions were originally created for workers to share in the profits of businesses that they help create. Feeling that it was an unfair situation that blue collar workers are the value creators of a business and the "fat cat" managers take all the profits, unions were formed to use collective bargaining to share more of the profits with the owners and managers of a company. These original union founders thought that it was not right for government employees to use collective bargaining as a tool because there are no profits to be made in government.

They are basically holding the taxpayer hostage to get higher wages. The end result is everyone loses except for the government employee. Restricting collective bargaining in government is fundamentally good for taxpayers, as long as there is a mechanism to ensure employees are fairly paid relative to the private sector (which Carter did with this bill).

So while democrats do support private sector unions, they have traditionally rejected the thought of government collective bargaining because it's basically robbing the taxpayer.

Yes, it supplied government regulations concerning when collective bargaining was justified or abused. Some functions of government are deemed essential services - components that cannot stop due to striking; an example would be Fire and Police protection. It also deemed that wage increases ought to be based on merit and not guaranteed.

It also gave employees the right to refuse (not be coerced into) joining the union affiliated with their job (the idea was that someone should be able to refuse union membership if they wanted to). 5 U.S.C. (Supp. III 1956) 118p, which was enacted under the presidency of Dwight D.

Eisenhower, banned strikes by government unions. This essentially destroyed a government union's leverage when attempting collective bargaining, not Carter's Civil Service Reform Act. Carter and the democratic congress were merely addressing key problems with the system as it was.

They were attempting to make federal unions/services jobs competitive with comparable private sector jobs and to provide protection to 'whistle blowers' that want to speak out against some form of injustice they witnessed inside these federal positions. The original fault ought to be laid upon President Dwight D. Eisenhower and the legislature of 1955.

I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.