Obama condemned the Benghazi attack the next day, vowed justice, and said the US will not bow to Acts of...?

The only way the incumbent can score points is for a disciple whose suppose to be just an impartial moderator, not a referee, to step in the picture at a moment's request making herself look foolish as she later recanted her interference, but still blame the use of the wrong word somewhat threw her off. http://virginiavirtucon.wordpress.com/20... The terror act the incumbent claims he addressed wasn't aimed at the terrorist whose ideology are bent on destroying the west giving the notion it could be anyone when there have been prior attacks by Islamist. A coptic christian fed up with the injustices perpetrated by islamist in the middle east are the perfect scapegoat with this administration to adhere to UN resolution 1618 as the incumbent displayed in his U.N. speech even appearing in 5 talk shows for weeks tauting on the video as responsible for the attack & deaths of 4 Americans on the night of 9/11, 'NOT' the policy & security measure the incumbent has implemented in the mid east, & specially middle eastern Islamist terrorist group.

A subordinate following policies put in place has balls to take responsibility before the one in charge promoting & putting in place policies that even lara logan disagrees with in tackling islamist ideologue extremist-ism, tells me that the wrong person is occupying the office who's chair has been vacant the last 4 years for leisure, fame, & glory sake whether it be in house concert, party, dinner, celebrity presence, talk show atmosphere, etc. as eye candy for the public away from security briefings & other strenuous administrative duties. Guards armed with flashlights & batons in a very hostile environment does not indicate a competent security & foreign policy. State secretary taking the bullet for the security failures of benghazi does not excuse the administration's attempt or scheme to redirect focus or jin up protest over a video through amb.

To U. N rice who takes orders from the executive house in an attempt to water down danger & return of Al Queda in the spotlight in an attempt to be sensitive to islamist under UN resolution 1618 that essentially over rides the 1st amendment. http://www.policymic.com/articles/16154/... http://www.examiner.com/article/benghazi... http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/10/is_barack_obama_a_compulsive_liar.html http://www.humanevents.com/2012/10/10/bombshell-security-officer-testifies-that-state-dept-ignored-his-request-for-more-protection-in-benghazi http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uFf0dUH3OtU.

He didn't say that it was an act of terror. He and his people said it was a spontaneous act for weeks after the incident. It wasn't motivated by the video.

It was a planned attack. And even if it wasn't, he shouldn't have ever excused any action based on a video. He should have said Americans value freedom of speech and any attack on us based on our beliefs will not be tolerated.

He is too busy trying to accept others from around the world that he has no concept that he is supposed to be protection us and our beliefs.

I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.