"YOU AND THE ART OF ONLINE DATING" is the only product on the market that will take you step-by-step through the process of online dating, provide you with the resources to help ensure success. Get it now!
Tricky, this, as there's no one single consistent style followed by all applications. As you say they are (broadly) synonyms In truth it doesn't really matter so long as your expected audience understands what you mean The biggest difference is between Properties, which usually affect a component or object, and the others, which affect the whole application Following an approximate lead from Visual Studio and other Microsoft products: Properties represent the characteristics of a single component or object in the application Options alter global ways that the application works. Microsoft products use this to customise the UI toolbar, for example.
There's an implication here that you can disable UI elements altogether (e.g. A "Simple" user interface or an "Advanced" user interface) Settings and Preferences change qualities of how the application works. The implication here is to change, not disable: for example, "Metric measurements" or "British Imperial measurements Configuration is often where an application is customised for each user or group But there's no single rule I'd suggest you use Properties for object characteristics and Settings for everything else that's application-wide.
Tricky, this, as there's no one single consistent style followed by all applications. As you say they are (broadly) synonyms. In truth it doesn't really matter so long as your expected audience understands what you mean.
The biggest difference is between Properties, which usually affect a component or object, and the others, which affect the whole application. Following an approximate lead from Visual Studio and other Microsoft products: Properties represent the characteristics of a single component or object in the application. Options alter global ways that the application works.
Microsoft products use this to customise the UI toolbar, for example. There's an implication here that you can disable UI elements altogether (e.g. A "Simple" user interface or an "Advanced" user interface). Settings and Preferences change qualities of how the application works.
The implication here is to change, not disable: for example, "Metric measurements" or "British Imperial measurements". Configuration is often where an application is customised for each user or group. But there's no single rule.
I'd suggest you use Properties for object characteristics and Settings for everything else that's application-wide.
I believe it's largely a matter of personal preference. However, I feel that I usually see properties as referencing one single part of an appliation, where as Options/Settings are usually a more global property. In addition, Preferences are probably not things that have as large of an impact as something labeled options or settings.
Things such as a minor change in the display or something similar. The most important thing is to have consistency across the application. And personally, I prefer the term 'options', as it sounds less intimidating that settings, properties, or configuration.
1 for the reasoning behind preferring 'options' - hadn't thought of that before. – hippietrail May 7 at 3:50.
One thing that I don't see in the answers here (although bobince alludes to it) is that you should consider what is typical for your environment/operating system. For instance on windows I think "Options" is the most common choice even though many programs use different words. Likewise "Preferences" for mac os.
Android OS uses "Settings" So bottom line, use what is most common for your environment.
Apart from Properties (which usually applies to a document or object inside a document, except when it doesn't), they're pretty much all the same. No-one agrees which terminology is best. For example for program config, Apple style is ‘Preferences’ in the application menu, GNOME style is ‘Preferences’ on the ‘Edit’ menu.
KDE style is a whole ‘Settings’ menu of its own. Windows style was ‘Options’ on the ‘Tools’ menu, though all bets are off now as more MS apps drop the menu bar and throw the old predictable controls all over the place with no consistent pettern. RISC OS style was ‘Choices’ on the icon bar menu, just to add yet another pointless possibility.
I'm interested in peoples' views on how best to store preferences and default settings in cross-platform applications. I primarily work in Perl on *nix and Windows but I'm also interested in the bigger picture. In the *nix world "dotfiles" (and directories) are very common with system-wide or application default settings generally residing in one path and user-specific settings in the home directory.
Such files and dirs begin with a dot "." and are hidden by default from directory listings. Windows has the registry which also has paths for defaults and per-user overrides.
I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.