" tl;dr no. The mutating table error is caused by querying the table which owns the trigger, or tables which are involved in a foreign key relationship with the owning table (at least in older versions of the database, not sure whether it still obtains). In a properly designed application this should not be necessary.
This is why many people regard mutating tables as an indicator of poor data modelling. For instance, mutation is often associated with insufficient normalisation.To paraphrase Jamie Zawinski: Some people, when confronted with a mutating table exception, think "I know, I'll use autonomous transactions. " Now they have two problems.
Sometimes the error can be avoided by simply modifying the :NEW values in a BEFORE INSERT OR UPDATE trigger or by using virtual columns. But you'll need to post more details to see whether these apply. But the best workaround is not to need any other kind.
Thanks! This confirms all i've been reading an experimenting. I am now changing the :new values on a before trigger; seems to work!
– JoséNunoFerreira Aug 3 at 8:55.
I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.