People for Obama care, overcome my objections will you please?

I believe he wants America to stumble and fall, Prayerfully the court will terminate obama care. We need to see how we can control the spiraling increase in heath care. Like; Limit money on settlements, why do doctors need to do many test that are not needed to cover their backs (from being sued).

People receiving any benefit need to be drug tested. If positive, they are dropped. Is this the change people want?

You must be joking. You produce a wall of text and expect people to go through it point by point. As a person living in one of the many countries that have government health care, let me say that it doesd work with none of the negatives that you suggest.

You really need to get out and see the rest of the world.

Not to worry, the Supreme Court will rule that government can not make us sign a contract, so the whole thing will fail (portions are not severable). And for the ignorant who liken it to car insurance, it is different because everyone who asks for a drivers license signs themselves voluntarily into a "quasi-contract" in which they promise to obey all parts of the vehicle code, part of which forces them to buy insurance. But they volunteered into a regulated enterprise.

Not so with health care insurance, there is no "latch".

As time goes on, polluted soil poisons drinking water and even the seeds won't grow in it unless they're genetically altered to tolerate the poisons our bodies can not. Side effect: the medical businesses booms as humanity spirals downwards to oblivion. Cancers in epidemic proportions fatten medical industry pockets who offer big campaign donations, but in the end socialized medicine, AKA Obama-care,contributes to loss of the freedom our capitalistic society treasures.

Socialization causes a natural progression ending with a society's collapse as in the Soviet Union's socialist experiment that failed miserably. " Prove it.

Let's start with your main objection, (tears) "I'd rather people choose between getting medical care and food than trying to work in a system where I might get slightly less efficient coverage for my incredibly high premiums. " The thing is, people at the low end of the economic spectrum, those earning less than 20,000 a year, can't afford to worry about being forced to wait in lines when they need medical care, they're usually greatly relieved just to have access to care. So the question is, who would be hurt by a slightly inefficient method of giving service to those who'd likely die as afford coverage, the answer seems to be insurance providers and their supporters.

Doctors will be glad that the patients who'd previously just drop in for service and leave the bill to rot will have some method of resolving a debt without selling their homes, patients will be glad to actually see a doctor without needing to work for a week to afford the visit. The government will have much more interest in supporting preventative medicine as a cost savings, so people will generally be healthier (and assuming you're a optimist, a happier bunch, too). So, since that would be the main points of contention, I'll lastly say that only a idiot would call for supporters of a motion to point out your intellectual inadequacies by using the name given by the most vitriolic of political opponents.

Calling it "Obamacare" is like asking the pig it's opinion on the slaughter after naming it "Bacon", it just reeks of class.

I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.