Please tell me the addressable market for U.S. prior art research (research related to the validity of patents)?
By finally allowing yourself to satisfy your cravings without sabotaging your diet, you can keep the weight you lose off for good, saving yourself hundreds and even thousands of dollars in the process Get it now!
Not legal advice: After reading your question a few times, I think I understand what you are looking for. You want to know what the market is for people/companies willing to pay a company for prior art research. Is that right?
If so, the total number of patents is only a jumping off point. You need to know what percentage of those patents outsourced prior art research? According to David Cleveland of the Minnessota Intellectual Property Law Association (1999), "while some companies may pay 10 or 15 thousand dollars to have an application prepared and filed, most small entities pay much less.
Most individual inventors are interested in getting a case filed for $3,000/$4,000 at the most. And that's for everything: search, lawyer's fees, governmental fees. " In 2007, 9899 utility patents were submitted by individuals and granted.
A total of 79,527 utility patents were granted in 2007 (out of 241,347 utility patent applications). The remainder granted were submitted by either corporations or organizations (69,628 or 88%). We can assume that corporations and organizations would pay for prior art research - the question becomes - how many have staff (in-house) that do this for them.
The following link will show you which corporations/organizations filed patents in 2007 and how many patents each filed. uspto.gov/go/taf/topo_07.htm#PartB. This chart only shows the top filers (companies filing more than 40 patents per year) - there are 62,104 non-named organizations left.It is my opinion that this group of 62,104 (78% of patent applicants) organizations would be your "addressable market" or target market.
Obviously there is no way to say for sure - there will be individuals willing to pay for research, there will be companies that are not. However, we also mustn't forget about the non-granted applicants (all 161,820 of them). I don't know as to why these applicants were denied, but one reason could be due to faulty or missing prior art research.
This is another section of your "addressable market. " Please take a look at the sources I provided and come to your own conclusions. Hope this helps you get started.
Good luck!
The U.S. Patent Statistics Chart for the Calendar Years 1963 - 2008 has not completely published the total statistics for 2008, but this year, the USPTO granted 157,772 utility patents and granted a total of 185,224 patents. uspto.gov/go/taf/us_stat.htm.WIPO keeps records of international patents. Their annual report says, "In 2006, applicants from Japan (514,047) and the United States of America (390,815) filed the largest numbers of patent applications worldwide.
A substantial number of filings also originated from the Republic of Korea (172,709), Germany (130,806) and China (128,850). " wipo.int/ipstats/en/statistics/patents/w... Let me know if you need more information. I would be happy to break it down further.
I am not quiet sure if this Answers your Question or not, but You really need to check out this Free Search Site. This will be handy . Recent US Patents Patents are published by USPTO once a week, on every Tuesday.An average of 3500 patents are published every week.
Patent applications go through a strict regime of patent prosecution, and if found to satisfy all patenting conditions, are published as granted patents. Granted patents have legal significance in that they grant ownership rights to the assignee of the patent. Most Popular Patenting Companies listed below / 2009 and back Free Patents Online now offers chemical search!
Through entry of chemicals via SMILES, the patent database can be searched using normalized chemical formulas to ensure much more comprehensive searching than possible using regular keywords........And its Free! Most Popular Patenting Companies IBM Canon ,HP ,Panasonic ,Samsung ,Micron, Microsoft ,Toshiba, 3M Computers: Control Computers Permitting Access Software: Finance Telecom: Cell Phones Communications Telephones Medical: Heart Surgery Cosmetic Surgery Dentistry Obesity Surgery Instruments Splints and Bandages Cancer Respiratory Drugs: Drugs Vasodialators Gene Therapy Measurement & Testing: Flow Meter Mass Probe and Sensors Geometric Instruments Electronics: Audio Signal Processing Chemistry: Bonding Molecular Biology Liquid Purification Imaging: Optical Systems Health: Exercise Devices (1) Exercise Devices (2) Food Weight Loss and Supplements Cooking Industrial: Land Vehicles Metal Working Nonmetallic Processes Pipe Couplings Cabinet Structure Manufacturing Materials Light Fixtures Bodies and Tops for Vehicles Internal-Combustion Engines Heat Accumulators Special Receptacle or Package Power Conveyor Refrigeration Hydraulic Engineering Ships Material Handling: Vacuum Handling Swinging Support Cutting Grinding Vehicle Attached Fluids Scrubbing and Cleaning Article Carriers Dispensing Buildings and Construction: Vibration and Earthquake Isolation Gutter-related Screen Walls Air Ventilation Supports Lighting Racks Sign Displays Furnaces Locks and Fasteners Ladders and Scaffolds Flexible or Portable Panels Home and Fashion: Apparel Baths & Closets Beds Chairs Husbandry: Animal Plant Recreation: Games Fishing and Trapping Toys Electrical: Conductors and Insulators Solar and Geothermal Heating Systems and Devices Outlets Connectors Measuring and Testing All documents are available in a highly-compressed PDF format for fast downloading, with or without Searchable text. Create Free Account.
A Prior Art search is conducted to evaluate the patentability of an invention based on the statutory requirements from a patent office. These statutory requirements for utility patents include: novelty, non-obviousness, and usefulness. The search identifies prior art that can potentially render an invention unpatentable, thus saving expensive patenting costs.
Prior Art Searches searches can be used to determine novelty prior to attempting to patent an invention, as well as to help enforce or debunk the validity of a patent. The following links should help you out: Patent information and prior art search fields and tools ipestonia.ourtoolbar.com/ Newly issued patents every week wikipatents.com/ Peer Reviews of Patents peertopatent.org/ Free online patent Search, including Market Research http://www.freepatentsonline.com/search.html.
Mobile analytics firm Flurry is closing out the year with a look into the forthcoming shift in mobile installed bases expected in 2012. Using data from the firm’s dataset of over 140,000 apps running worldwide, it was able to calculate smartphone penetration in established markets like U.S. and Europe. Then, using additional data from the IMF in combination with Flurry’s own data, the firm was able to then determine which countries represented the top market opportunities for mobile app developers.
Not surprisingly, China and India made the list. To start, Flurry looked at a snapshot of apps running across its user base over the past 30 days in order to rank the current addressable market. The U.S. led the way, with an installed base of 109 million out of 264 million (41%).
Flurry notes that 264 million is about half of what Apple and Google say they’ve activated – something that can be accounted for by old device replacement. China (#2) and South Korea (#4) appeared in the top five, ranking above Japan (#5), France (#6) and Germany (#7). The U.K. is #2.
Next, Flurry wanted to determine which markets hold the most future promise. It used the adult population counts from the IMF, then adjusted the numbers based on the size of the middle class in each country using a study by Miller-McCune. Flurry then estimated the size of the upper class for each country, as those folks could also afford a smartphone.
This way, China, India and Brazil would not be over-represented in the estimations just because they have large populations. And yet, they did make a showing. China has 122 million users who could afford an iPhone or Android.
The U.S. has 91 million, India 75 million, Japan 65 million and Brazil 34 million. In the final bit of analysis, Flurry wanted to determine the world’s largest addressable markets, regardless of penetration. For starters, it looked at current market maturity (the measure of how penetrated smartphone devices are among a country’s addressable audience.) The U.S., with the largest light blue circle in the graph below, has the largest total addressable audience (TAM) at 200 million.
Sweden is the most mature country with 3.2 million of 5 million (66%) addressable consumers already using iOS and Android devices. France, 10th in maturity, has 9.6 million of 34 million (28%) consumers using iOS and Android devices. In looking at the future addressable markets, Flurry found that even though India’s total population is not far behind China’s, its total addressable market is.
Meanwhile Japan, the world’s fourth largest market, has a lot of upside given light penetration of iOS and Android devices against its large, addressable market, says Flurry. Using this method, the top 10 addressable markets are the U.S., China, Japan, India, Germany, Brazil, Italy, France, the U.K. and Russia. More analysis can be found on Flurry’s blog post.
I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.
Related Questions
What are internal validity and external validity Why are they so important to researchers?
Trying to remember a book title - a young male art expert who solves an art related art crime/mystery?
How do you make a Swing/JFace/SWT GUI addressable?
How many patents did Research In Motion have in its patent portfolio in 2006?
What does this mean 4 RELATED INDIVIDUALS OR CORPORATIONS sale validity?
What is the diffrence between folk art, naive art and outsider art?