Scott Brown, the Republican candidate for Ted Kennedy's senate seat, posed nude for Cosmo in 1982?

Heckkkk no, she wouldn't have been taken seriously! Any woman with a nude centerfold pic in a magazine would've faced a double threat in her political career: #1 - WOMEN, who would've berated her for compromising herself and making all women look like pieces of meat. Feminists would've been all over this and called for a stronger woman to take a leadership position.

And I kind of agree that I would want a woman in office who has more wisdom and better judgement than to pose nude in a society like ours that still struggles to treat women as equals. #2 - MEN, some of whom first, would criticize her appearance and demean her with mockery. And then they'd use that as an open door to politically dismiss her as a flighty woman.

A nude photo would be a political weapon against her. Imagine if Sarah Palin had posed nude before running as VP? Can you imagine how skewered she would've been?

I'm sorry to say that I ascribe to the double standard to some extent. I personally find it refreshing to see a male figure splashed in photos across the media for a change (no more melons! I can't takes the jugs anymore!), and I find it mildly humorous that he posed for it...because it doesn't MEAN the same thing for him to have done it.

It just doesn't. He's representing a gender and race that has always dominated in politics, so the pressure isn't there to "prove" his character on behalf of his entire gender. He'll get a free pass for this.

But a woman wouldn't, and probably won't a thousand years from now.

Stormy Daniels, an apparent candidate for Senate in Louisiana, has posed nude, to put it mildly, and a lot more. Scott Brown mostly has his looks going for him. The Cosmo spread was quite a few years ago though.

No, I do not think so. The standard for male vs female politicians is definitely not on a level playing field. Being a male it is going to be viewed by the majority of male politicians as a badge.

If it was a female the view would no doubt take a turn for the worse, it would be used as ammo toward her credibility to the point that regardless of her qualifications she would not get a fair shake. It is sad that this is the way things are at this time.

Unfortunately, in my opinion. No. Plus it would be a much bigger story.

I had no idea Scott Brown did that and I am willing to bet not many others did as well. Why? Because the Press knew people wouldn't care that much about a guy doing it.

But if it was a girl, every newspaper and TV station would run a story about it.

There's a popular blogsite where you can see all those scandal pics and videos. They update their site regularly so i'm sure you can find all that you're looking for specially those papparazi shots. The site is NSF though.

Here are the sites: deathbyporno.sensualwriter.com/category/... haydenkho.sensualwriter.com.

I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.

Related Questions