Worse because then only the criminals would have guns. It depends by what you mean by banned. In Europe the cops use bobbies.
If the cops stop using guns they made them illegal only the criminals would have guns. Once you put salt in the water you can not abstract it. It says in the amendments that we have a right to bare arms.
To protect us from the government. I kind of see little use for that seeing how the government has nuclear arms. It was necessary when the government was weak and new like a baby.
It was just starting off could take a turn for the worse. I think you should have to pass a mental test before you can get a riffle. You can get a riffle without a permit!
You can not ban guns then only the drug dealers would have them. Their not going to say '''oh the government forbids guns.'' Then stop using guns their selling drugs to began with going against the Government.
Better, no questions asked. But even if they are banned, people still have underground sources and ways of getting them. What happens next?
They threaten to kill someone, and that person doesn't have a gun for protection because he actually respected the fact that they were banned. It wouldn't work wonders though. Lives would still be lost.
What about kitchen knives? Would they ban those too? A person can be killed with on of those, but they're also used in kitchens.
Hmm.. :).
I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.