Federer gained 1000 points (200 x 3 wins in RR + 400 for reaching the final), Murray 200 (1 win in RR). The distance between them was 1.130 points. The rest is maths.
Had Roger won the final, he would've overtaken Andy as no. 2 (undefeated champion, 1500 pts). Of course, his bad performances in the two last ATP 1000s are to blame for his finishing “only” third.
It's true. Federer lost out to Murray in the points race that makes up the ATP rankings. The margin between them was not large.
A single match, or just a few strategic points over the season by either player might have made the difference.
I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.