So, Creationists... why apes?

"YOU AND THE ART OF ONLINE DATING" is the only product on the market that will take you step-by-step through the process of online dating, provide you with the resources to help ensure success. Get it now!

It is only the American culy churches and home schooled that oppose both evolution and the christian church! The Pope, Catholic Church, Church of England and mainstream churches all accept the big bang and evolution! Lord Carey the former Archbishop of Canterbury put it rather well – “Creationism is the fruit of a fundamentalist approach to scripture, ignoring scholarship and critical learning, and confusing different understandings of truth”!

The dates science uses are wrong dinosaurs existed with man as these carvings of men show http://www.angelfire.com/mi/dinosaurs/di... it does not take 10,000 years for some thing to become a fossil http://www.angelfire.com/mi/dinosaurs/fo... no man did not come from africa about 100,000 years ago science is wrong the earth is not that old their dating method is not based on factual evidence http://pubs.usgs.gov/gip/geotime/age.htm... its a assumption based on no evidence 95% is not a close match at all the current scientific data is all wrong and a lie dna has to be 99% to be related we have similar body types two legs, two arms, similar organs. That does not how ever mean we are related its a assumption science has again made. No they wouldn't it does not take long for fossils to form http://www.cartage.org.lb/en/themes/sciences/lifescience/PhysicalAnthropology/EvolutionFact/FossilisationFossil/FossilisationFossil.htm Example : An open-cast mine in Germany contained a large quantity of tree trunks that had been fossilised.

The fossilised trunks pass through twenty feet and more, of different sedimentary rock layers. From a uniformitarian geological perspective, these trunks that have no roots and are cut clean at the bottom (using a primitive cutting tool) were fossilised in this position over hundreds and millions of years. This clearly contradicts the conditional requirements for fossilisation.

These trunks would have decomposed long before those millions of years! The tree trunk, therefore, poses the most awkward problem. The sedimentary rock- strata surrounding the trunks must have been laid rapidly; more so because they are positioned upright.

These tree trunks were not fossilised over hundreds of millions of years.

I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.

Related Questions