SQL Server 2000 Index - Clustered vs Non Clustered?

For exact same indexes, there's no performance gain. Actually, it incurs performance loss in insertion and updates . However, if there are multicolumn indexes with different column order, there might be a valid reason for them.

Maybe I'm not thinking hard enough, but I can't see any reason to do this; the nature of the clustered index is that the data is organized in the order of the index. It seems that the extra index is a complete waste.

I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.

Related Questions